(Rotten Tomatoes with the pic.)
Back in 2005 -- when Capote hit theaters, wowed critics and grabbed the biggest of all Oscar nominations -- I almost fell asleep watching the step-by-step retelling of how author Truman Capote came about his signature book, In Cold Blood.
Of course, I was in college then. Maybe I was tired from studying*. So I gave it another chance recently.
Nope. Still boring.
Now, it's not bad. Obviously the acting is excellent, especially Best Actor
And yet ... so what? Why are we watching this? The story on the pages of In Cold Blood -- captured documentary-style in writer-director Richard Brooks' fantastic 1967 adaptation of Capote's book -- is engrossing. The story behind it -- about the author balancing the book and his personal feelings for Collins' execution-bound character -- not so much. There's a point there, something about a writer getting too close to his work and ultimately becoming affected by it, but is it really worth the two hours?
TFO says no.
But hey, at least it's still better than the movie that beat it for Best Picture.